Thursday, December 29, 2011

Seniors - Stay Young at Heart!

Fairy tales can come true – it can happen to you – if you’re young at heart… 

I first heard that opening refrain some 50 plus years ago.   If you’ve forgotten the song take a moment to reacquaint yourself with its valuable lyrics.

Moving toward maturity…

Unfortunately for me, it was at the time, just another song among dozens of other songs my family would sing at holiday-family parties.  Ah,  misspent youth!

Over the years however, as I continued to lose family and friends, the lyrics took on a deeper meaning and importance to me. 

Take a moment to listen once again.

Bad Strategy – Poor Leadership

It’s been a difficult year for members of PRPD’s Senior Center; a year of upset and loss.  This sorry story, with its resultant turmoil and angst could have been easily avoided had PRPD management, including recent and current Board Leaders just taken this advice…

Life’s train long ago left the station.

So, now that the battle is over it’s time to sit back and see what happens. It’s time to experience the newCenterand time to reevaluate your relationship with the Park Ridge Park District.  Some of you, like me, have already reevaluated and will move on.  Some of you have already changed your Wills to reflect your change of heart and others are doing the same as I write this post. 

Yes, life’s train has left the station but you my friends, are not yet at your final destination.  And that is something to be joyous about, don’t you think?

So, it’s time to focus once again on what’s truly important.

May you have a Young at Heart New Year!

As always, it’s just my opinion!

Tuesday, December 20, 2011

Watchdog’s Trizna calls this kettle black!

When one sits on a toilet, one should not be surprised when shit happens.  Of course, that assumes one has access to the toilet.

Callig Kettle Black

Bob Trizna, Park Ridge’s own “Watchdog stated the obvious the other day when he wrote that this blog site was a “vehicle” used by Senior Center members in their “propaganda campaign” against the Park Ridge Park District Board by members of the Senior Center.

It’s too bad he didn’t also tell his readers that he’s been doing the exact same thing on behalf of the Park Ridge Park District Board leadership; a group he’s had close ties to since his days as a former PRPD Board Member.

Yes, it’s true, I’ve given Park Ridge Senior Center members a forum to express their thoughts on what is for them a vital issue.  I too have expressed my opinions on the subject when I thought my opinion would add some clarity to the discussion.   I’m sorry Mr. Trizna and some of his friends on the PRPD Board have a problem with the choices I’ve made or the words and opinions I’ve expressed.  I’m sorry if they’ve found themselves feeling like Frosty.

Picking Nose

Look folks, the Park Ridge Park District Board created this mess when it refused to heed the advice of its former Executive Director, Ray Ochromowicz and Board Attorney, Tom Hoffman to enter into a two-year final agreement with the Seniors.

The Board leaders exacerbated the problem by dealing with those same seniors as if they had been coroneted instead of inaugurated!

One more thought!

In case Bob is reading this.  The post you commented on passed the 1,000 view mark today.  See the guy with the happy face?  That’s not me - yet!

MLCC97 -17

Peace, Joy and Merry Christmas!

Of course, it’s just my opinion.

Tuesday, November 29, 2011

The end is nigh!

Yesterday’s resignation by long-time Park Ridge Senior Center Manager, Teresa Grodsky marks the beginning of the end for Park Ridge’s Senior Center.  Ms. Grodgky was both the glue that held the membership together and the engine that made the center run.

I first met Teresa Grodsky the day I tendered my membership dues. She welcomed me to the center, thanked me for the cash and gave me a cooks-tour of the facility. Whenever I walked in to the building, I always received a smile and a wave.  Over time, I learned from long-time members that Teresa was the reason the Center functioned so well. I also learned that she was their shepherd (with all that that implies) leading her flock from activity to activity.

Over the last few months, I found myself wondering how long she would last. It was clear to me over a year ago that Teresa Grodsky would have to go, and that the Board would have to push her out if they were to achieve what I believed to be their end; the complete elimination and replacement of the old Senior Center regime.

Well, now they’ve gone and done it!

Of course, the Board can deny their roll in the matter as I’m sure they will, and say that Teresa left the job and friends she loved for over 30 years, because she wanted to.

Unfortunately for this Board, those of us on the ground, those of us who spoke and worked with Teresa Grodsky, those of us who only the other day were discussing next years schedule, know differently!

So, what’s next for this Senior Center? 

Who knows? 

All I know is that the glue and motor and the heart are gone.

And I for one, will never renew my membership!

The real tragedy, of course, rests on the  shoulders of the other Senior Center Members.  Many of them have truly lost their leader and friend.  As individuals, each will have to determine their future relationship with the Park District. 

To The Park Ridge Park District Board!

It’s one thing to have “Park Ridge Senior Center” plastered on the front of the building. 

It’s something else all together to have a Senior Center.

Of course, it’s only my opinion.

Wednesday, October 5, 2011

Board Aborts Its 6-month-Old “Resolution”

On September 15, 2011, Park Ridge Park District Commissioners reneged on their 6-month-old “Resolution”.  This document was designed to free the Board from damaging public opinion, negative public comments by Senior Center members, and their own internal struggle.  The “Resolution” was an attempt to put an end to the 30-year contractual relationship between the Park District and Senior Services, Inc.  Senior Services Inc. is a nonprofit 501(c)3 that represented Senior Center member’s.

When I heard this news I didn’t know whether to laugh or cry.  This easily solved and sorry saga had just morphed from being a cheap interpretation of…

into

Before we know it, they’ll stop relying on their attorney and local press and lead out this new pitch man to explain their actions.

 

Note: Click purple words or phrases for further information.

So what happened?

The Seniors were assured prior to the last general election that the “Resolution” was the document controlling senior centered activities.  Seniors were assured nothing would change and no contract or agreement was required to govern the Boards relationship with the Seniors. 

The Boards “Resolution” Park Ridge voters were told, was something all Park Ridge Seniors could trust and believe in! 

So, if the “Resolution” was something to trust and believe in then; as repeatedly and vigorously expressed by current Board officers; namely President Mary Wynn-Ryan, Vice President, Dick Biagi, Board Secretary, Richard Brandt and majority members of the Board prior to the last election, why was it trashed for a worthless letter? 

Gee, so much for the trust and mutual respect promoted by prior Boards!

Obviously, the the words of high ranking PRPD Board Officials and their “Resolution”, was not worth the webpage space, paper or gigantic Resolutionposter it was printed on.  The Board demanded the poster’s installation just inside the door at the Center.  Some Seniors thought it a daily reminder to Senior’s of the Boards power.  Others thought it a big talisman designed to ward off evil sprits.  Worthless either way!

Question is, why would this Board trash their Resolution”?

I believe the “Resolution” was trashed because it was never THEIR resolution to begin with

Based on Ms. Wynn-Ryan’s account, the unsolicited “Resolution” was apparently created over a weekend and delivered to the Board just prior to its unannounced introduction and Board approval on February 17, 2011, by Board’s Attorney.  This story was reaffirmed by: Mr. Biagi and Mr. Brandt, at the same Park Ridge Library pre-election meeting.

So, what is the public to believe and trust now? 

The public was led to believe and trust in a shamResolution”, now, just an old fashion crock of dung as it were.  They were led to believe the hyperbole surrounding Ms. Wynn-Ryan and Mr. Biagi’s undocumented story and assertion that “the public” was afraid of going into the Senior Center and that parents and children were rudely denied use of the Senior Center’s restrooms by Senior Center members.  Apparently, a false assertion now debunked!

See: Restroom-gate - Park Ridge Park District President acknowledges long-time crapper access problem… and Restroom-gate continued – Park Ridge Park District says NO lists of formal complaints of complainers exist!

Now, the public is being asked to believe that this new document, (one in a string of attorney-to-attorney letters), to be the official document underlying a NEW binding agreement.  

Oh spare me!

 Aborted - Attorney Created – Unsolicited – Pre-Election Resolution

clip_image00212
clip_image0024_thumb3

That Morphed Into the “Current Letter of Agreement”.

Thomas G. Hoffman Letter - 09-11-2011

If one were to read Jennifer Johnson’s 09/27/2011 article describing this event as only she can, one would get only the Boards side of the story.  Apparently, this scribe neglected to reveal offers made at the meeting by Senior Center representatives to report their side of the controversy.  Not to worry however, many here in Maine Township have been reading Ms. Johnsons adventures in local journalism for several years and have learned to expect nothing more.

PRA - Jennifer Johnson Article - 09-22-2011

So you think you’re confused?

(Photo: Mircea Costina / Caters News )

Well, the Seniors are now more confused than ever and are tired of being sniffed by a fox.  It’s time for the Board to get its nose out of Senior tush and quit playing games.  This Boards self-imposed problem will not go away, no matter how foxy the maneuver, such as the one perpetrated last month.

Surprise!  You’ve just been Punked by the Board.

There is no “pact”, there is no agreement.  And no, the “letter” does not just supersede the pending “cooperative guideline” agreement, a Board-known nonstarter. More over, it supersedes the February 17, 2011 Board passed “Resolution”, a document the Board Attorney apparently did not wish to reference when interviewed, nor was it referenced in the letter in question.

Senior's Response Letter 09.14.11

 Just a couple notes. 

Note #1:

Just to be clear, based on Park Ridge Park Board Minutes, the board meeting to implement the “Cooperative Guideline” was canceled, and therefore, NO Board Passed “Cooperative Guidelines” exist. 

Note #2:

For an agreement to happen, both sides (Park Ridge Park District and Park Ridge Senior Senate) must first formally agree.

Talking points for possible agreement as discussed in on-going attorney communication are not an agreement made.

Note #3: 

The Board was aware that “the letter” written by Boards Attorney and used as the basis for the so-called “agreement”, had already been formally rejected by the Senior’s attorney prior to the Board meeting vote.  Why these public servant's would have the audacity to initiate this apparent scam is beyond me.

Of course, unless you live in a world of little dictators or you’re a befuddled fox!

So, what really is behind that so called agreement letter and how does it fit into this mess?  That’s still what many of us in the public are trying to figure out.

One More Question

The board has and continues to speak with forked tongue.  They repeatedly cry poor, when in fact, they have recently been discussing a possible acquisition of additional land, behind closed doors. 

Land Acquisition

image

image

Just thought I’d ask!

As always, it’s just my opinion.

Thursday, September 15, 2011

Restroom-gate continued – Park Ridge Park District says NO lists of formal complaints of complainers exist!

Just when you thought the dung surrounding Restroom-gate couldn’t get any deeper or stink any worse, we find out this.

Note: Read email-string from bottom to top.

Email - FOIA 110909-001

Gee Ms. Wynn-Ryan!  Gee Mr. Biagi!  Where’s the proof to your story?  Don’t even tell us it was a family member, as someone near the Board recently suggested.  Have you no shame?

My research went back as far as 01/01/2005. 

Surely, an issue this important, and one used repeatedly as a reason for your current actions, would have generated one official report or the name of one citizen offended!

You two fools would have been better off saying nothing!

Is it any wonder why many Senior Center members have difficulty believing anything the two of you have to say?

It’s time for this Board to remove these two leaders from their leadership positions.  In fact, they should be drummed out of the corps for fabricating stories!

Of course, it’s just my opinion!

Saturday, August 27, 2011

Cooperative Guidelines – My Turn!

Park Ridge Park District (PRPD) has continued to drag this sad episode out for over 300 days, that’s 300+ missed opportunities since September, 2010 to make things right, to change:

 

 

to

The Senior Center issue has gone from a minor political problem to a full-blown disaster. 

When I started writing about the subject last Fall, I never in my wildest dreams thought I would be writing about it still.  Yet here we are, no closer to a reasonable solution.

Last January was the watershed month.  The Seniors had been led to believe there was a deal, a renewal of their 30-year contract.  The Board twice placed the issue on the agenda only to table it until  a later date.  Of course, that date never came.  Instead, the Board issued a “Resolution”, an unsolicited document written by Boards Attorney, a product designed to appease Senior Center Members and remove forever, the need for discussion and an UP or DOWN vote of the “dreadedcontract proposal.  Of course, it didn’t hurt to have the issue off the table as some Board Members were running for reelection.

The “Resolution”, Seniors were told by Board Members Wynn-Ryan and Biagi prior to the election, guaranteed continued Senior centered programs.  Ms. Wynn-Ryan even went so far as to state the following in an email to then Senior Senate President Barb Ingolia:

"You know my position on senior programming and services -- we need more, and that's the Park District's mandate and promise, which does NOT depend on any deal with the fundraising foundation. (In fact, I'd like to have Senior Senate play a bigger role. But that's just me.)

Later, she went on to say here on this blog site:

I guess I didn't say it often or loudly enough: Park Ridge residents who are seniors can continue to depend on a variety of programs, events and activities from the Park District because that's an important part of why there even is a RECREATION and Park District…” and “…No matter who wins or loses in the upcoming election, the Park District WILL be providing programming for seniors.” 

The Resolution

clip_image002
clip_image002[4]

A “Resolution” is not a contract.

After reading the document for the umpteenth time, I still fail to see a total and binding commitment to future senior centered activities by PRPD.

So how did some Seniors see the “Resolution”?  I think that can be summed up this way:

And then!

Cooperative Guidelines for Park Ridge Recreation and Park District & Park Ridge Senior Services, Inc. supersedes “Resolution”.

What a stunner!

After weeks of silence following a breakdown in negotiations, the Board issued, without first discussing its content and receiving voted approval for issuance at an open meeting, a document clearly designed to supersede the February 17, 2011 Board “Resolution” and to set the stage for future changes in Senior Center member relations.

Cooperative Guidelines – Version 1.0 (Undated)

image_thumb[23]
image_thumb[20]
image_thumb[18]

The feeling I had when first reading that document can best be seen in the clip below:

The tone of that document clearly suggested who would dictate what and who would hold power over whom. 

Yes, part of that clip is clearly over the top but you get the point at the emotional level. 

Seniors were stunned, confused, rejected and angry!

So what kind of politically blind and inept Board did Park Ridge citizens elect that they could have so easily turned a simple political solution into a long drawn-out fiasco? 

A Simple solution not taken.

To solve this problem, all the Commissioners had to do in January 2011 was:

  • renew the contract for one-year with the proviso that no additional contracts would be forthcoming
  • add two adjustments or amendments:
    • open the building up for additional non-senior activities after 5PM
    • increase the Seniors share of the Center’s operating cost by 10% or more 
  • create a committee of seven, made up of three Senior Center or SSI members or combination and three Commissioners or Park District employees or combination plus an outside mediator, their task, reorganizing the Center and operating relationships for future years.

Job done!  Case closed!  No muss, no fuss, no upset, no bad publicity! 

The Board has just issued “Cooperative Guidelines, Version 2.0” and now, Senior Center Members have gotten an attorney of their own!

  • The Board created this problem. 
  • The Board continues to perpetuate this problem. 
  • Only the Board can end it!

Press here for: this Senior writers free advice!  PRPD, should consider that advice an “Ace” they can keep!

New leadership at the top.

Finally, maybe it’s time for President Wynn-Ryan to remove herself from the board and for the Board to find new leaders who can implement and live up to the spirit of their independently created “Resolution”. 

In the mean time, might I suggest Jerry Lewis?

clip_image002_thumb1

Why Jerry? 

  • Jerry’s available after Labor Day. 
  • He works damn hard.
  • He’s focused year after year.
  • He brings people together.
  • He succeeds.
  • Jerry’s a professional clown
  • He has a sense of humor. 
  • He knows how to bring BIG money to the organization.
  • France’s Senior’s still love him!

As always, just my opinion!

Wednesday, August 3, 2011

Restroom-gate - Park Ridge Park District President acknowledges long-time crapper access problem…

or she doth skipth to the loo!

Rarely does one get a opportunity to see such estrogen or testosterone fueled fury as was apparently displayed at the July 21,2011 Park District Board meeting.  Faced with a crowd of angry Senior Center members, Ms. Wynn Ryan and Mr. Biagi apparently revealed what some PRPD observers already suspected, the underlying reason for PRPD’s unprecedented takeover of it’s former Senior Center “Clubhouse”, was not money, not expanded access for additional PRPD programming, but a perceived need for unfettered public access to the buildings crappers!

Surely you say, you’re full of it!   But what else could it be?

First the public was told the Park District needed more money.  When the Seniors relented in their contract proposal to more money, the reason turned to open access for more Park District revenue generating activities.  When Seniors relented in their contract proposal to sharing the facility after normal hours, the reason for taking back their “Clubhouse” was no longer discussed; at least until now. 

Apparently someone complained to a Board member of having been turned back from using one of the Senior Center potties.  I’m not kidding folks, as you’ll see for yourself in a moment. 

The first time I heard this complaint was from Commissioner Biagi at the pre-election meeting held at the Park Ridge Public Library.  Mr. Biagi was so animated when he blurted out this new senior-center-deal-breaker, one would have thought his knowledge of the incident to be first hand.  Of course, had it been, I’m sure he would have stated so that night.

So who did it?  Was it a Senior?  Was it a PRPD employee?  No one seems to know who the perp was.  No matter, then Senior Senate President, Ms. Barbara Ingolia, apologized for the apparent indiscretion; said she would look into it and would instruct Members to display proper etiquette when dealing with these delicate matters.

At the time, I thought the whole thing too funny, considering the significance of the Senior Center issue.   So, I thought nothing else of the “incident” until reading an article in the paper about last months General Board Meeting brouhaha.  Apparently Ms. Wynn Ryan chose that meeting to raise that messy little stinker up again.

Now, read this comment from on Bob Trizna’s Watchdog website discussing the subject of who’s running the Senior Center.  An anonymous commenter wrote the following:

…Have you ever tried to use the bathroom at the senior center? If you have kids and want to take them to the bathroom at the senior center while playing at the ballpark, or playground, they will refuse you entrance. I know several families that have not been allowed to use the bathroom at the senior center…”.

So now we know the Boards dirty little secret.  They’ve been using the Senior Center issue as a smoke-screen to cover up the Park District’s lack-of-loos and their apparent failure to provide adequate and strategically placed portable toilet facilities, thus requiring mommies with children to go begging.   Who-would-a-thunk-it?

Now, I’m all for public access to bathrooms.  But I have three questions:

  • Have any of you gone into the “publicly accessed” bathrooms at McDonalds on Oakton and Rand  just after a Saturday morning Park Ridge baseball or soccer game?  It ain’t pretty! 
  • Further, there’s a school just to the south of the Center, park and pool.  Does that school allow unfettered public access to taxpayer-paid school bathrooms while school is in session?   I don’t think so.
  • Isn’t there a public access bathroom directly behind the Senior Center?

Of course, it’s only my opinion!

Friday, July 15, 2011

Cooperative Guidelines – Without Comment…. Updated 07/21/2011

This is my follow-up post to Finally, PRPD Board Offers Its Own - Senior Centered Proposal.  Unlike prior postings, I have chosen to refrain from providing extensive comments of my own at this time.   Instead, I thought I would just display the Board’s Resolution, a document  referred to in the proposal, a copy of the original Cooperative Guidelines as presented to the Seniors for their signing, followed by a more easily read point-by-point Cooperative Guidelines Report by Line, for your consideration.

I would appreciate you’re reading this post in its entirety before commenting, should you so choose.  

Background

The Park Ridge Recreation and Park District  and Senior Services, Inc. (the Senior Center membership’s representative) have been partnering to support Senior Citizen activities at the Park Ridge Senior Center for thirty (30) years.  These partnership arrangements have been codified in the form of multi-year contracts.  The last iteration of that contract having expired on December 31, 2010.

The intent of this post is to publically present in context, the Board’s new cooperative agreement; a unilateral list of working rules presented to Senior Services, Inc. (SSI), an independent 501 c3 organization, without public notice or fanfare, a couple weeks ago.

The document included a demand for SSI’s acceptance by 07/21/2011. 

Bear in mind that this manifesto was delivered to SSI prior to its public presentation, vote and approval by the Park Ridge Park District Board, which by the way, is scheduled to happen tonight

Apparently, the implementation of the new “Guidelines”, in conjunction with the District’s previously published “Resolution”, is the Boards attempt to restructure by fiat , the prior working PRPD/SSI/Senior Center relationship.

I’ve written extensively about this tragedy at various times over the last several months.  I call it a tragedy because this 200+ day-old political, strategic and angst-creating debacle did not have to happen. I gave the Board a working solution as early as 09/25/2010.   

Now, the observations presented at Butterly on Senior Issues are just my opinion.  My “Photoshopped” version of events, so-to-speak.  At the same time, the Board has presented to the public it's “Photoshopped” version of events.  Apparently, the public, including many seniors, are still feeling contextually deprived when it comes to this story. So I thought I would add a bit more background material to help bring the entire picture info fuller focus.

Thirty Years of Close and Mutually Beneficial Cooperation

The Rat-Hole

The Board would like the public to believe that the building currently being used as the Park Ridge Senior Center, was always the way we see it now; it’s current size; a facility that is clean, organized, equipped, well led, fully functioning, and of course, completely paid for by our taxed dollars. 

Of course, PRPD Commissioners would also like the public to believe that the Seniors currently rely on and have always relied on, the largess of PRPD.   As you will see, nothing could be further from the truth. 

When the Seniors first took over the then “Storage Facility” it was described by one volunteer, as a “rat-hole”;  dirty, cluttered, unkempt.  As I understand it, there actually were rat droppings.  The Seniors, (many of them having since passed away), spent hundreds of elder-hours cleaning and prepping the building prior to opening day.  

A lot of Senior investment in time and money has happened since then.

Major Additions

Initial addition to the building (1980’s)

$350,000

Stage addition (1999)

$300,000

On-going Remodeling and Equipment

Library (furniture, shelves, carpet)

Lobby furniture and display cases
Lobby and hallway wallpapering
Valances in the card room
Painting and redecorating washroom
Updating of sound system
Purchased pool tables
Purchased ceramic kiln
Purchased kitchen supplies and small appliances
Purchased pianos (baby grand and 2 digital pianos)
Storeroom addition
Purchased air conditioning of building
Converted doors into emergency doors
Made washrooms handicap accessible
Purchased all tables and chairs in the drop in area
Purchased game tables
Purchased computer club projector
Purchased banquet tables
Purchased two big screen televisions
Paid for original remodeling of the kitchen (1990)

Added Cash Payments made by SSI to Park Ridge Park District

2006 $112,000
2007 $103,000
2008 $120,000
2009 $125,000
2010 $104,000

More than Money

The Park Ridge Senior Center is not money or a building.  It’s people.  There would be no Park Ridge Senior Center, or at least the vibrant one we still have today, without its core; its long-time active members.  Those people are the driving force behind the Center; not the employees and certainly not the Board.  They are unhappy!  They are feeling abused and disrespected by these Board Members.

Putting a face to these documents

As you read the text of the next three documents, I want you to put faces to their authors.

Click on a name to send email to your elected representative.  Yellow = Officers

Ms. Wynn- Ryan Mr. Biagi Mr. Thillens Mr. Vile 
 
Mr. Brandt Mr. O’Brien Mr. Hunst  

 February 17, 2011 Resolution

image image 

Cooperative Guidelines

image_thumb[23] 
image_thumb[20] image_thumb[18] 

Cooperative Guidelines Report by Line

Note: AR = (A)uthority and/or (R)esponsibility.

Item

Page

Expectations

Who

Obligation

AR

1

WHEREAS, the Board of Park Commissioners of the Park Ridge Recreation and Park District ("District") adopted Resolution No. 11-1 on February 17, 2011 (the "Resolution"), and

1

WHEREAS, the District's Executive Director, Gayle Mountcastle, has reviewed the matters pertaining to the operation of the Park Ridge Senior Center and the relationship between the District and Park Ridge Senior Services, Inc. and recommended to the Park Board that such relationship going forward (if it is to continue) should continue on the basis of the following Cooperative Guidelines, with which the Park Board has concurred, with the mutual expectation that SSI and the District will proceed to work together, if at all, in good faith, with the expectation of mutual reliance on the points hereinafter set forth:

1

SSI is a 501-C3 corporation that provided the Park Ridge Senior Center with financial and advisory support.  SSI has an eleven member Board of Directors that meets six times per year at the Senior Center.

1

The mutual expectations of the parties are set forth below:

1

1

Serve as advocates for Park Ridge Seniors for the purpose of further providing healthy living opportunities during the aging process.

SSI

Advocate

R

2

1

Conduct fundraising, accept donations, and encourage bequests to the District's use in supporting the operation of senior programs.

SSI

Marketing

R

3

1

Invest donations, fundraising dollars and bequests in a manner to obtain the best income yield consistent with due regard for the conservation of principal.

SSI

Finance

R

4

1

Provide input into applications for financial support submitted to obtain additional funding.

SSI

Finance

R

5

1

Accept financial support from donors, both individual and/or organizational.

SSI

Fundraise

R

6

1

Approve expenditures of SSI funds when indicated to be used for the purchase of equipment and supplies for senior center programs.

SSI

Pay Bills

R

7

1

Turn over to the District all monies received by SSI during each calendar quarter from all sources (including but not limited to proceeds of donations, fundraising, and grants) not later than 30 days after the end of each quarter, but not in excess of $15,000 per quarter; provided, however, that in addition to the forgoing required payments any monies received by SSI in a calendar quarter shall be paid by SSI to the District at the end of the next succeeding quarter, if any, during which monies received by SSI were less than $15,000, to the extent necessary to result in the District being paid $15,000 or as much there of as possible for each succeeding quarter, and further provided that any monies received by SSI in a calendar year in excess of the sum of $60,000 shall be paid by SSI to the District within 30 days after the end of such year.  All monies thus paid to the District shall be used solely to defray the expense of programs and operations for seniors.

SSI

Fundraise

R

8

1

Notify the District within 30 days of receipt of any bequests received.

SSI

Fundraise

R

9

2

Plan and implement at least one annual fundraising event.

SSI

Fundraise

R

10

2

Offer fundraising events which will produce worthwhile net revenue, review proposed events with District staff prior to committing to the event for the purpose of determining if it is likely such event(s) will achieve such goal, or otherwise to not offer such event(s).

SSI

Fundraise

R

11

2

Insure against loss, theft, and other perils to its own personal property which as of June 2011, consists of the items listed below and any other additional personal property which SSI acquires or owns in the future, to be added to this list on an annual basis: Baby Grand Piano, Ceramic Kiln, Four (4) Pool Tables, Two (2) Big Screen TV Sets, All Lobby Furniture and Display Cases, All Tables (7 card tables, 12 banquet tables) and chairs (50) in the "Drop-In" Area at the center, Game (4) Tables, All Equipment in the Kitchen other than the Major Appliances, Projector used for the Computer Club, Two (2) Digital Pianos, Banquet Tables.

SSI

Insure

R

12

2

Prepare periodic financial reports showing only its own district revenues and expenses [not those provided by or expended by the District] such that same are timely available for SSI Board meetings and usable for the annual audit.

SSI

Book-Keeping

R

13

2

Prepare and provide a year-end income and expense statement to the District within 30 days after the end of each calendar year of its operation.

SSI

Book-Keeping

R

14

2

Prepare, timely file and provide to the District copies of all required State and Federal governmental reports and timely pay all amounts due in connection therewith.

SSI

Book-Keeping

R

15

2

Promptly inform the District of any revocation of its tax-exempt status and of any involuntary dissolution of its corporate existence.

SSI

Humble-Themselves

R

16

2

Make no claim at any time against the District, its officials, commissioners, agents, employees, successors and/or assigns for reimbursement or repayment to SSI of any unamortized capital improvements cost such as might arguably otherwise be required had any previous Agreement between SSI and the District been canceled by the District prior to its expiration.

SSI

Give Up Rights

R

17

2

Provide District with a certified copy of a resolution, in form reasonably acceptable to the District, duly adopted by the SSI Board of Directors not later than July 21, 2011, indicating its approval and acceptance of these Cooperative Guidelines.

SSI

Ultimatum-Deadline

R

18

3

Provide leisure, recreational and social opportunities for seniors at 100 S. Western Avenue, Park Ridge, Illinois or at any other location(s) which the District deems appropriate to offer and/or facilitate such senior opportunities.

PD

Facilities

RA

19

3

Provide District employees to carry out senior programming at the above location or at any other location(s) which the District deems appropriate to offer and/or facilitate such senior programming.

PD

Employee-Services

RA

20

3

Have sole responsibility for the hiring, evaluation, and discipline of such employees in accordance with the District's Personnel Policy Manual and to the extent applicable, the District's Collective Bargaining Agreement.

PD

Employee-Services

RA

21

3

Offer a wide variety of senior programs and evaluate continuously to assure the success of such programs.

PD

Programs

RA

22

3

Allow all seniors in Park Ridge the opportunity to register and participate in programs.

PD

Programs

RA

23

3

Have the sole responsibility for setting and collecting membership dues and fees and charges for all activities.

PD

Book-Keeping

RA

24

3

Permit others use of the building at such times and on such days as the District determines will not frustrate the purpose of these Guidelines.

PD

Programs

RA

25

3

Permit SSI to remove its personal property from the building, but not fixtures or capital improvements, upon request.

PD

Perceived Generosity

A

26

3

Make any improvements or alterations in, to or upon the building which District may deem necessary or desirable, from time to time.

PD

Facility-Mgmt.

RA

27

3

Periodically require those District employees who serve as staff at the building, with approval from the Superintendent of Recreation, to submit a list of requested equipment and supplies for consideration for funding from SSI.

PD

Facility-Mgmt.

RA

28

3

Provide a Park Commissioner to serve as a liaison to SSI, to be appointed by the President of the Park Board from time to time.

PD

Board-Ambassador

A

29

3

Provide SSI with a certified copy of a resolution duly adopted by the Park Board not later than 2011, indicating its approval and acceptance of these Cooperative Guidelines.

PD

Deadline

RA